Introduction

 

The longevity of seeds during storage is influenced by traits such as genetics and environment during maturation and harvest, seed moisture content and storage conditions (Cromarty et al. 1982; Walters et al. 2010). Low moisture content and low storage temperature slow down the chemical reactions of seed aging by retaining cells structure and enzymes in a stable state for long periods (Chang et al. 1996; Sun 1997; Bernal-Lugo and Leopold 1998). Sugars are central to this process. As seed moisture is reduced, soluble sugars form a grassy state which serves as a physical stabilizer by suppressing deteriorative reactions (Franks 1994; Walters et al. 2010).

Ultra-drying is a technique used to reduce the seed moisture content to acceptable levels suitable for safe long-term storage at ambient temperature (Li et al. 2007). Research on ultra-drying (Ellis et al. 1990; Huang et al. 2002) has focused mainly on its use as a low-cost plant germplasm conservation method (Zheng et al. 1998) which is favored in developing countries because it eliminates the need to use refrigerated storage for seeds (Ellis et al. 1989; Zheng 1994).

Potential benefits of ultra-drying include improvement of seed longevity and vigour (Koster 1991; Ellis et al. 1995; Li et al. 2007; Huo et al. 2011). Many reports indicate that ultra-drying to a moisture content of 2 to 5% could potentially increase seed life span by 4 to 39 times, depending on the species (Harrington 1972; Ellis et al. 1986). More importantly, Ellis et al. (1996) and Demir and Ozcoban (2007) showed that the loss in viability is more rapid in dry (5.1–6.8% moisture content) than in ultra-dried (2.0–3.7% moisture content) seeds of carrot, groundnut, lettuce, oilseed rape and onion stored at 20°C for five years. In contrast, some studies have reported that ultra-drying causes a significant reduction in the viability of stored seeds (Vertucci et al. 1994; Hu et al. 1998; Walters and Engels 1998). This seems to occur when seeds are dried below a critical water content which is species or even cultivar specific (Woodstock et al. 1976; Ellis et al. 1988). However, Ellis (1992) has shown that real damage usually occurs when seeds imbibed water during germination and not during the storage process. Based on these research findings, it is now a standard recommendation that dry and ultra-dry seeds should be humidified prior to germination in order to raise their moisture contents slowly in the initial stages of germination to minimise any loss to viability (Powell and Matthews 1979).

The success of ultra-drying is measured in terms of seed survival rate and vigor. The difference between germination rates measured before and after drying seeds to different moisture contents is indicative of deterioration caused primarily through oxidation damage that affects seed survival (Walters et al. 2010). Germination tests have been used extensively to show the positive results from ultra-drying seeds (e.g. Ellis et al. 1993, 1995, 1996; Li et al. 2007; Pérez-García et al. 2007; Demir and Ozcoban 2007). However, very few previous reports (Li et al. 2007; Pérez-García et al. 2007, 2008) have examined the effect of ultra-drying on seed vigour which is known to influence significantly plant growth and yield (Ellis 1992). Seed vigour is a complex term which refers to the aspects of seed performance which show variation such as the rate and uniformity of germination, and seedling emergence and growth under variable environmental conditions (Perry 1978). Enhanced tolerance to desiccation stress, resistance to aging processes and improved germination and seedling growth have been noted for seeds subjected to slow drying processes (Adams et al. 1983; Vertucci and Farrant 1995) typical of ultra-drying techniques (Li et al. 2007). Rosenberg and Rinne (1986) suggested that improved seedling growth may be explained by the dependence of the initiation of cell division in the root and shoot meristems on a drying treatment during seed development.

There is some evidence that ultra-drying seeds of species and cultivar down to specific critical moisture contents may also increase seedling tolerance to other stresses caused by salinity and soil pH. For example, Huo et al. (2015) reported preliminary results showing that ultra-drying accelerated germination and seedling emergence of alfalfa subjected to alkali stress. This suggests that ultra-drying may be a useful process to improve establishment in soils considered marginal for planting alfalfa, especially in western China where alfalfa is the most important forage species currently sown to both improve soil quality and support ruminant production (Jiang et al. 2007). However, before these claims of stress tolerance can be substantiated, it is essential to gain a better understanding of the effects of seed ultra-drying on the growth and physiology of alfalfa in unstressed conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the ultra-drying of alfalfa seeds and then storing at room temperature would provide better seedling growth and vigour, and to identify possible mechanisms that explain differences in the growth of alfalfa seedlings grown from normal and ultra-dried seed by monitoring key physical and physiological indices in both seed and seedlings.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Alfalfa seed source and ultra-drying treatment

 

Seeds (~1 kg) of Medicago sativa L. cv. Longdong were collected from 200 plants in October 2007 from the Lanzhou Forage Station (36°05′26” N, 103°41′57” E) which forms part of Gansu Agricultural University, Gansu Province, China. The initial seed purity at time of collection was 99 and 79% of initial germination percentage (GP), and the initial moisture content (MC) of 9.05%. The seeds were stored at room temperature and humidity in ventilated darkness for 1.5 years until required for the experiments.

Approximately 160 g of stored seed was packaged in porous nylon bags (20 g/bag), placed into a cooled hermetic desiccator and buried in silica gel that diurnally dried at 120oC. The ratio between seeds and silica gel was 1 to 10 (w/w) (Zeng et al. 2006). After desiccation for 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 216 h, seed MC was reduced to 7.10, 6.94, 6.36, 5.73, 5.47, 5.19, 4.98 and 4.60%, respectively, from an initial MC of 9.0% for the control (Table 1). Seed MC was determined by drying at 105oC for 72 h (James and Don 2005). Ultra-dried and control seeds were sealed in aluminium foil packages and stored in a desiccator fulfilled with dried silica gel at room temperature (24.5oC ± 1.5oC).

 

Pre-germination treatment of ultra-dried seeds

 

Prior to use in the following series of experiments and tests, ultra-dried seeds were rehydrated to avoid imbibitional damage (Ellis et al. 1990). Seeds were placed into sealed glass desiccator for 24 h (24.5oC ± 1.5oC) containing saturated CaCl2 solution to produce a relative humidity (RH) of 35%, and then hydrated for another 24 h using NH4Cl (RH = 75%) (Huang and Gao 2000).

 

Lipid peroxidation and total soluble sugar in ultra-dried seeds

 

Lipid peroxidation of seeds was measured in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) content (µmol/g FW) (Loreto and Velikova 2001). For each ultra-dried treatment four replicates each of 0.5 g seeds were homogenized in 2 mL 20% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid containing 0.5% (v/v) thiobarbituric acid. The mixture was heated for 30 min at 100°C to release protein-bound MDA, centrifuged at 10000 × g for 10 min after cooling, and the absorbance of the supernatant read at 532 nm and 600 nm. The absorbance at 600 nm was subtracted from the 532 nm reading, and the concentration of MDA was calculated by the means of extinction coefficient of 155 L mM–1 cm-1 (James and Don 2005).

Total soluble sugars were determined using the Anthrone reagent following the method of Stieger and Feller (1994). Four replicates of 0.5 g seeds from each treatment were homogenized and the centrifuged filtrate (12000 g 10 min) (Chandel et al. 1995) mixed with anthrone reagent (20 mL ethanol, 100 mL 1 M H2SO4, 200 mg anthrone) and heated for 10 min in a vigorously boiling water bath. Samples were cooled on ice for 10 min to stop the color development. Absorbance was read at 623 nm and soluble sugar determined using a glucose (0100 µg) calibration (Roulin and Feller 2001).

Seed germination test

 

The experiment was set up to investigate the effects of ultra-drying treatment on germination of alfalfa. Seed surfaces were sterilized using 10% (v/v) Na-hypochlorite before the germination test and seedling growth. Four replicates of 50 seeds each were then arranged on two layers of filter paper moistened with 5 mL de-ionized distilled water in 6 cm diameter petri dishes. Dishes were placed in an incubator (SPX-100B-Z Biochemical Incubator; Shanghai Boxun Medical Equipment Factory, Shanghai China) with constant temperature (24°C) and complete darkness. Germination was defined when the length of the radicle was 2 mm (Song et al. 2005). Germinated seeds were counted daily. Seed vigour and viability were quantified by the germination index (GI) for each ultra-drying treatment which was calculated as the product of the germination percentage and the hypocotyl length after 4 days of germination (Vertucci et al. 1994).

 

Seedling growth responses

 

Alfalfa seeds were grown in sand cultures to test the effect of ultra-drying on seedlings growth, biochemical and physiology responses. Ten replicates each of 25 germinated seeds for each seed ultra-dried treatment were sown in individual polyvinyl plastics pots (12 cm in diameter and 15 cm high), filled with dry river sand (2 mm sieve mesh, washed with de-ionized water for 3 times and autoclaved for 2h at 121°C). At the sowing time seeds in each pot were irrigated with 25% Hoagland’s solution (Hoagland and Arnon 1938). The same solution which was placed in polyvinyl plastic trays to a depth of 1 cm, was topped up to the marked level with distilled water daily and changed weekly. Pots were arranged in the trays in a randomized block design.

The experiment was performed in controlled environment growth chamber at Gansu Agricultural University (36°05′18′′, 103°42′8′′E); altitude 1520 m). Typical conditions during the 22-day treatment period included were temperature of 24°C to 28°C, relative humidity 45 to 93%, and maximum photon-flux density under 12 h of light 1430 µmol m–2 s–1.

Shoot height of 10 seedlings chosen randomly in each treatment was recorded at 5, 10, 15 and 22 days after sowing. Leaf photosynthetic activity was characterized by the number of active PS II reaction centers determined by chlorophyll fluorescence, and was measured using a fluorimeter (FMS-2, Hansatech Instruments Ltd., U.K.) in randomly selected, fully expanded leaves. The optimal quantum yield of PS II (Fv/Fm), reflecting the functional activity of PS II reaction centers, was measured on 10 seedling chosen randomly in each treatment 4 h before plants were harvested 22 days after sowing pre-germinated seeds.

Surviving seedlings in each treatment were counted, harvested and the leaves, stems and roots of each plant were separated. Leaf number, root length, and fresh biomass of shoots and roots of each seedling were recorded. The leaf area of 10 fully expanded leaves chosen randomly in each treatment was measured using a CI-203 Leaf Area Meter (CI-203, CID, Inc., USA). Physiological measurements were done as soon as possible after plants were harvested.

Root dehydrogenase activity related to respiration capacity was measured by the triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) reduction technique (Huang and Gao 2000). Roots (0.5 g) of each treatment were placed into test tubes with 60 mM Na2HPO4–KH2PO4 containing 0.6% (w/v) TTC and 0.05% (w/v) Tween 20, incubated the tubes for 20 h at 30°C. All formazens formed from the reduction of TTC by dehydrogenase enzymes in living roots was extracted in 95% (v/v) ethanol for 4 h at 60°C (all temperature control were in incubators). The absorbance of the extractants was read at 480 nm.

The chlorophyll (a + b) content of randomly sampled leaves (0.5 g) was determined spectrophotometrically in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma Chem. Co., USA) using the method of Fridgen and Varco (2004). Leaves were placed in vials containing 10 mL of DMSO for approximately 45 min until all the chlorophyll (a + b) was removed and kept on ice in darkness until analysis. Absorption was measured using a Spectrophotometer (S2000, WPA Co., U.K.). The concentrations of chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll were calculated using equations described by Barnes et al. (1992).

Lipid peroxidation in leaves was measured in terms of MDA content (Cakmak and Horst 1991). Four replicates of previously frozen alfalfa leaves (0.5 g) from each ultra-drying treatment were homogenized in 2 mL 20% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid containing 0.5% (v/v) thiobarbituric acid and measured as described above.

Buffer-soluble carbohydrates were measured according to Stieger and Feller (1994). The centrifuged filtrate (10–20 µL) was mixed with 1 mL anthrone reagent (20 mL ethanol, 200 mg anthrone, 100 mL H2SO4) and heated for 10 min in a vigorously boiling water bath. Colour development was stopped by incubating the sample on ice for 10 min, and the A623 was measured. Glucose (0–100 µg) was used for calibration (Roulin and Feller 2001).

Four replicates of seedling leaves (0.5 g) derived from each treatment were homogenized and analyzed for soluble sugars according to the method described above.

 

Statistical analysis

 

For each treatment ten replicates were set up in a completely randomized design. Four tissue sample replicates

 Fig 1

 

Fig. 1: Root dehydrogenase activity measured in 22-day old seedlings derived from seeds with different MC (%). Columns identified with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05, after applying Duncan test

were used for physiology and biomass analyses. Data is presented as mean ± S.E. and differences of variables between treatments were compared using 1-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s method where P < 0.05.

Results

 

Effect of ultra-drying seed biochemistry and germination

 

Seed biochemistry: Ultra-dry seeds exhibited a higher vigor level than the air-dried control (MC = 9.1%) indicating that the biochemical processes of stored alfalfa seeds are tolerant to dehydration down to about 5% MC. Soluble sugar concentration increased exponentially (R2 = 0.794) to a maximum at 5% MC relative to the control (P < 0.05) and then declined back to the control concentration at 4.6% MC (Table 1). In contrast, MDA concentration decreased (P < 0.05) to a minimum at 5.2% and increased second only to the control MDA concentration at 4.6% MC (Table 1). This suggested that MC of 5% is near the optimal for alfalfa seed at which the integrity of the biochemical processes are maintained. There was little decrease in seed MC when the drying period was extended beyond 216 h.

Germination: The germination percentage (GP) of ultra-dry alfalfa seeds with MC ranging from 5.7 to 5.0% were higher (P < 0.05) than the air-dried control seed by 8 to 13% (Table 1). However, for the seeds with a MC of 4.6%, GP was significantly (P 0.05) lower than control which reflects the impact of changes in seed biochemistry at seed MC <5%, particularly total soluble sugars and MDA (Table 1). A fitted curvilinear relation indicated that total soluble sugar content of seed explained 93% of the variation in germination with germination >92.5% at total sugar content >64 mg g-1 FW. In contrast, MDA concentration tended to reduce germination with >95% germination when MDA was <8.98 nmol g-1 FW. There was no consistent effect of ultra-drying on hypocotyl length measured 4 days after the start of germination.

 

Effect of ultra-drying seeds on seedling growth and biochemistry

 

Seedling growth and root dehydrogenase activity: Seedling derived from seeds dried to a MC of 5.5 to 5.2% had significantly higher (P < 0.05) total biomass than the control (Table 2). This was due to a difference in root mass 33 to 64% higher (P < 0.05) than the control because there was no significant difference in shoot biomass between seed treatments (Table 2). The higher production of root mass was not due to a more extensive root system as several other treatments produced significantly (P < 0.05) more root length than control (Table 2), but rather to thicker roots produced in seedlings derived from seeds with MC 5.5 to 5.2%. Root dehydrogenase activity measured in 22-day-old seedlings showed a cyclic pattern with an initial significant (P < 0.05) decline to a minimum for germinating seeds with 6.9% MC, increasing to a maximum at 5.2% and then declined again to the same minimum for germinating seeds with 4.6% MC (Fig. 1).

Although, there was no difference in shoot mass between treatments and significant differences in the dynamics of the above ground biomass such as shoot height, leaf number and leaf area. Differences in shoot height Table 1: Characteristics of M. sativa (cv. LongDong) seeds dried to different moisture contents and stored for one year

 

Ultra- dry period (h)

Moisture content (%)

Germination percentage (%)

Hypocotyl length (mm)

MDA content (nmol g-1 FW)

Soluble sugar content (mg g-1 FW)

0

9.05 ± 0.07 a

85.50 ± 4.43 c

52.38 ± 2.49 cd

11.62 ± 0.22 a

56.99 ± 0.14 e

12

7.10 ± 0.02 b

78.50 ± 2.52 d

69.00 ± 2.58 a

9.49 ± 0.42 b

62.31 ± 0.53 d

24

6.93 ± 0.01 c

72.50 ± 2.52 e

63.13 ± 4.33 b

9.27 ± 0.21 bc

61.23 ± 1.20 d

48

6.36 ± 0.01 d

89.50 ± 4.12 bc

43.25 ± 2.06 e

9.17 ± 0.15 bc

61.81 ± 1.04 d

72

5.73 ± 0.03 e

94.50 ± 3.0 ab

52.13 ± 2.96 cd

8.98 ± 0.37 c

64.04 ± 0.91 c

96

5.47 ± 0.02 f

96.50 ± 3.42 a

53.25 ± 4.94 cd

7.11 ± 0.31 e

66.25 ± 0.95 b

120

5.19 ± 0.05 g

96.00 ± 3.65 a

49.75 ± 3.09 d

6.64 ± 0.36 f

67.73 ± 0.42 a

144

4.98 ± 0.02 h

92.50 ± 3.00 ab

65.25 ± 4.92 ab

8.38 ± 0.37 d

66.44 ± 0.50 b

216

4.60 ± 0.02 i

79.00 ± 3.46 d

57.25 ± 2.06 c

9.50 ± 0.31 b

63.74 ± 0.22 c

Means ± S.E (n =4). Different letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 (Duncan test)

 

Table 2: Biomass of roots and shoots, root length for M. sativa seedlings derived from seeds with different MC (%) for 22 d

 

Moisture content (%)

Root length (cm)

Shoot biomass (mg) FW

Root biomass (mg) FW

Total biomass (mg) FW

9.05

6.7 ± 0.3 e

105.3 ± 26.7 bc

84.0 ±14.2 c

189.2 ± 20.6 c

7.10

7.6 ± 0.3 bc

103.0 ± 14.4 bc

110.1 ± 14.4 b

213.1 ± 21.2 bc

6.94

7.1 ± 0.4 cde

105.0 ± 20.0 bc

103.5 ± 21.3 b

208.5 ± 5.1 bc

6.36

7.1 ± 0.3 de

105.9 ± 9.0 bc

111.0 ± 19.2 b

216.9 ± 28.2 bc

5.73

7.0 ± 0.2 de

111.9 ± 12.3 bc

102.0 ± 15.2 b

213.9 ± 16.7 bc

5.47

7.8 ± 0.2 ab

126.4 ± 9 .5 a

112.0 ± 21.3 b

238.4 ± 29.8 ab

5.19

8.1 ± 0.3 a

119.0 ± 15.9bc

138.9 ± 19.5 a

258.0 ± 24.1 a

4.98

7.5 ± 0.4 bcd

102.0 ± 11.6 bc

109.1 ± 14.9 b

211.0 ± 13.8 bc

4.60

7.4 ± 0.5 bcd

98.1 ± 21 .0 c

105.6 ± 10.7 b

203.7 ± 26.1 bc

Values are means ± S.E (n =4). Different letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 (Duncan test)

were most pronounced at day 22 of growth with seedlings derived from seeds dried to 5.7% reaching maximum height 25% higher (P < 0.05) than the control (Fig. 2A). Enhanced growth from ultra-dried seed increased with seedling age since there were no differences in seedling height observed at day 5 of growth and only a few differences at day 10 and 15 (Fig. 2A). Seedling height differences were correlated to differences in leaf number and leaf area. For leaf number, only seedlings from seeds dried to 5.5% MC produced significantly (P < 0.05) more leaves than the control (Fig. 2B). However, the level of ultra-drying had broader positive and negative effects on leaf area. Seedlings derived from seeds dried within a range 5.7 to 5.2% had up to 15% more (P < 0.05) leaf area than the control, whereas seedlings from seeds dried to 5% or less had 9% less leaf area than the control measured at day 22 (Fig. 2C).

Chlorophyll content of seedling was not significantly different as a result of pre-germination seed treatment, except for seeds with a MC of 6.9 and 5.0%, where a significant (P < 0.05) reduction and increase in chlorophyll content, respectively was found (Fig. 3A). Irrespective of seed MC, seedlings in this study maintained nearly maximum quantum efficiency of PS Ⅱ photochemistry (Fv/Fm) (Fig. 3B).

Leaf MDA content is a physiological index which reflects the degree of plant’s ability to withstand injury or stress. The results showed a pattern of significant (P < 0.05) decline in MDA content of seedlings derived from seeds with MC ranging from 9.1 to 5.5%, and a significant increase in MDA content for seedlings from seeds dried to a MC <5.5% (Fig. 4A). This is consistent with changes of MDA measured in seeds (Table 1). The soluble sugar content of seedling leaves decreased (P < 0.05) in control for seedling derived from seeds within the MC range of 7.1 to 5.0% (Fig. 4B). However, the soluble sugar content of seedlings increased (P < 0.05) by 28% for seedlings derived from seed with MC of 4.6% relative to the control (Fig. 4B).

 

Discussion

 

Desiccation tolerance is one of the most fundamental properties of seeds (Leprince et al. 1993; Chandel et al. 1995; Stéphane et al. 2018) and the ability of seeds to remain viable under severe desiccation is dependent on the drying rate and final seed moisture content (Hill et al. 2010). Studies indicate that a seed MC of around 5% is optimal for seed storage (Harrington 1972), depending on storage temperature (Ellis and Hong 2006). Our results confirm findings reported by Ellis and Hong (2006) that the low moisture content limit for alfalfa seed is in the range 4.2 to 5.5% with the upper value applicable when seeds are stored at room temperature (24℃) as in this experiment.

The higher (P < 0.01) germination observed at seed MC of 5.0 to 5.7% (Table 1) is related to concentrations

 

Fig. 2: Growth of Medicago sativa seedlings derived from seeds with different MC (%). Number of leaves (A) and Leaf area (mm2) (B) at 22 d and Shoot height (C) at 5, 10, 15 and 22 d DAT, respectively. Values represent means ± S.E., n = 4. Values sharing same letters differ non-significantly (P > 0.05)

 

of total sugars and MDA. The accumulation of sugars appears central to a seed’s ability to retain viability under desiccation by protecting membranes and proteins, develop a glassy state for intracellular water and provide a carbon reserve for germination (Hoekstra et al. 2001). Although total sugar concentration was increased by ultra-dying to 5% seed MC and explained a high proportion of the variability in germination of alfalfa seed dried to different moisture contents, this correlation most likely reflects an altered carbohydrate composition rather than simply the total sugar concentration per se. Tetteroo et al. (1994) reported that during slow dehydration of alfalfa seed the carbohydrate content changed with oligosaccharides concentrations increased and both glucose and fructose content decreased. This study measured total sugar content, but the implication of increased total sugar

\

 

Fig. 3: Chlorophyll content (A) and optimal quantum yield of PS II photochemistry (Fv/Fm) (B) of seedlings derived from seeds with different MC (%) for 22 d. Optimal quantum yield of PS II photochemistry (Fv/Fm) (B) at midday in randomly selected, fully expanded leaves. Values represent means ± S.E., n=4. Values sharing same letters differ non-significantly (P > 0.05)

 

 

Fig. 4: MDA content (A) and soluble sugar content (B) of leaves of seedling derived from seeds with different MC (%) at 22 d. Values represent means ± S.E., n=4. Values sharing same letters differ non-significantly (P > 0.05)

 

content observed at 5% seed MC together with Tetteroo et al. (1994) finding that a glassy state was formed during dehydration with oligosaccharides as the possible stabilizer resulting in less deterioration of ultra-dried seed than the control.

Another positive effect of ultra-drying was a reduction in lipid peroxidation which has been identified as the major cause of reduced viability, vigour and germination percentage of stored seeds (McDonald 1999; Cakmak et al. 2010). Determination of MDA provides a convenient method to quantify the extent of lipid peroxidation (Goel et al. 2003). The lower level (P < 0.05) of MDA measured for alfalfa seed with an MC of 5.5% in present experiment suggests that these seeds had an efficient antioxidant defensive system that limited the degree of lipid peroxidation relative to seeds dried to other moisture contents (Li et al. 2007) for Liminium aureum (L.) Hill. Zhu and Chen (2007) reported that for moderate ultra-drying of peanut (MC 2.0%) lipid peroxidation and radical emergence where inhibited relative to peanut dried to MC 0.9%, especially after accelerated aging. Seed aging does seem to exert an influence on lipid peroxidation (Huo et al. 2011) and ultra-drying treatment of accelerated aged alfalfa seeds to 5.72% seed MC helped to maintain seed vigor due to lower lipid peroxidation.

Changes in seed biochemical composition caused by ultra-drying were also linked to improved seedling performance other than germination. While it is well documented that early seedling growth is correlated directly with the quantity and utilization of seed reserves (Westoby et al. 1992), most often expressed as differences in seed size (Turnbull et al. 2008), there are few reports describing the effects of changes in seed biochemical composition on seedling growth. The study results showed a higher root mass and thicker roots produced in seedlings derived from seeds with MC 5.5 to 5.2% suggesting that relative nutrient allocation to these seedlings was higher than controls. Fits with Lloret et al. (1999) observation linking higher relative growth rate with nutrient allocation (especially sugars) to root development.

 

Conclusion

 

The results provided an important insight into the possible importance of ultra-drying as a practical means to improve alfalfa establishment. And seedling derived from seeds dried to MC of 5.2% had higher biomass, and higher root dehydrogenase activity. Enhanced growth from ultra-dried seed increased with age with seedlings derived from seeds dried within a range 5.7 to 5.2%. Perhaps more important is the effect of the ultra-drying process on seed biochemistry that promotes tolerance in alfalfa to stress in both saline and alkaline conditions warrant for further studies.

 

Acknowledgements

 

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (41561072) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31660691) and Natural Science Incentive project of Guizhou Province ([2018]5778-05) and Guizhou Education University Academic Discipline Project (Biology). We thank Professor Shangli Shi and Professor Liming Hua (College of Grassland Science, Gansu Agricultural University, China) for critical reading and correction of the manuscript. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their substantial contributions during the development of the manuscript.

 

References

 

Adams CA, MC Fjerstad, RW Rinne (1983). Characteristics of soybean maturation: Necessity for slow dehydration. Crop Sci 23:265‒267

Barnes JD, L Balaguer, E Mnarique, S Elvira, AW Davison (1992). A reappraisal for the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environ Exp Bot 32:85‒100

Bernal-Lugo I, AC Leopold (1998). The dynamics of seed mortality. J Exp Bot 49:1455‒1461

Cakmak I, WJ Horst (1991). Effect of aluminum on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Plant Physiol 83:463‒468

Cakmak T, Ö Atici, G Agar (2010). The natural aging-related biochemical changes in the seeds of two legume varieties stored for 40 years. Acta Agric Scand 60:353‒360

Chandel KPS, R Chaudhury, J Radhamani, SK Malik (1995). Desiccation and freezing sensitivity in recalcitrant seeds of tea, cocoa and jackfruit. Ann Bot 76:443‒450

Chang BS, RM Beauvias, A Dong, JF Carpenter (1996). Physical factors affecting the storage stability of freeze-dried interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: Glass transition and protein conformation. Arch Biochem Biophys 331:249‒258

Cromarty AS, RH Ellis, EH Roberts (1982). The Design of Seed Storage Facilities for Seed Conservation. Handbook for Genebanks No. 1. International Board of Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy

Demir I, M Ozcoban (2007). Dry and ultra-dry storage of pepper, aubergine, winter squash, summer squash, bean, cowpea, okra, onion, leek, cabbage, radish, lettuce and melon seeds at -20°C and 20°C over five years. Seed Sci Technol 35:165‒175

Dussert S, J Serret, A Bastos-Siqueira, F Morcillo, E Déchamp, V. Rofidal, P Lashermes, H Etienne, T JOët (2018). Integrative analysis of the late maturation programme and desiccation tolerance mechanisms in intermediate coffee seeds. J Exp Bot 69:1583–1597

Ellis RH (1992). Seed and seedling vigor in relation to crop growth and yield. Plant Growth Regul 11:249‒255

Ellis RH, TD Hong (2006). Temperature sensitivity of the low-moisture-content limit to negative seed longevity-moisture content relationships in hermetic storage. Ann Bot 97:785‒791

Ellis RH, TD Hong, D Astley, AE Pinnegar, HL Kraak (1996). Survival of dry and ultra-dry seeds of carrot, groundnut, lettuce, oilseed rape, and onion during five years' hermetic storage at two temperatures. Seed Sci Technol 24:347‒358

Ellis RH, TD Hong, EH Roberts (1995). Survival and vigor of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds stored at low and very low moisture contents. Ann Bot 76:521‒534

Ellis RH, TD Hong, MC Martin, F Perez-Garcia, C Gomez-Campo (1993). The long-term storage of seeds of seventeen crucifers at very low moisture content. Plant Var Seeds 6:75‒81

Ellis RH, TD Hong, EH Roberts, KL Tao (1990). Low moisture content limits to relations between seed longevity and moisture. Ann Bot 65:493‒504

Ellis RH, TD Hong, EH Roberts (1989). A comparison of the low-moisture-content-limit to the logarithmic relation between seed moisture and longevity in twelve species. Ann Bot 63:601‒611

Ellis RH, TD Hong, EH Roberts (1988). A low-moisture content limit to logarithmic relations between seed moisture content and longevity. Ann Bot 61:405‒408

Ellis RH, TD Hong, EH Roberts (1986). Logarithmic relationship between moisture content and longevity in sesame seeds. Ann Bot 57:499503

Franks F (1994). Long-term stabilization of biologicals. Biotechnology 12:253‒256

Fridgen JL, JJ Varco (2004). Dependency of cotton leaf nitrogen, chlorophyll, and reflectance on nitrogen and potassium availability. Agron J 96:63‒69

Goel A, AK Goel, IS Sheoran (2003). Changes in oxidative stress enzymes during artificial ageing in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seeds. J Plant Physiol 160:10931100

Harrington JF (1972). Seed storage and longevity. In: Seed Biology, Vol. 3, pp:145245. Kozlowsli TT (Ed.). Academic Press, New York, USA

Hill JP, W Edwards, PJ Franks (2010). How long does it take for different seeds to dry? Funct Plant Biol 37:575‒583

Hoagland D, DI Arnon (1938). The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stat Bull 347:1‒39

Hoekstra FA, EA Golovina, J Buitink (2001). Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:431438

Hu C, Y Zhang, M Tao, S Chen (1998). The effect of low water content on seed longevity. Seed Sci Res 8:3539

Huang BR, HW Gao (2000). root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in Tall Fescue cultivars. Crop Sci 40:196‒203

Huang ZY, XS Zhang, GH Zheng, XM Jing, J Lin (2002). Increased storability of Haloxylon ammodendrom seeds in ultradry storage. Acta Bot Sin 44:239‒241

Huo PH, JF Li, JX Liu, SQ Zhang, SL Shi (2015). Cross adaptation of Medicago sativa seedlings germinated from ultra-dried seeds to saline and alkaline stresses. Intl J Agric Biol 17:860868

Huo PH, JF Li, SL Shi, SQ Zhang, WH Zhao (2011). The effect of ultra-drying and accelerated ageing on vigor and physiological activity of alfalfa seeds. J Grassl Chin 33:2834

James RM, FW Don (2005). Seasonal patterns of glutathione and ascorbate metabolism in field-grown cotton under water stress. Crop Sci 45:193‒201

Jiang JP, YC Xiong, Y Jia, FM Li, JZ Xu, HM Jiang (2007). Soil quality dynamics under successional alfalfa field in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of Northwestern China. Arid Land Res Manage 21:287‒303

Koster KL (1991). Glass formation and desiccation tolerance in seeds. Plant Physiol 96:302‒304

Leprince O, GAF Hendry, BD Mckersie (1993). The mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in developing seeds. Seed Sci Res 3:231246

Li Y, HY Feng, T Chen, XM Yang, LZ An (2007). Physiological responses of Limonium aureum seeds to ultra-drying. J Integr Plant Biol 49:569‒575

Lloret F, C Casanovas, J Penuelas (1999). Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root:shoot ratio, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Funct Ecol 13:210216

Loreto F, V Velikova (2001). Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Plant Physiol 127:1781‒1787

McDonald MB (1999). Seed deterioration: Physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Sci Technol 27:177237

Pérez-García F, ME González-Benito, C Gómez-Campo (2008). Germination of fourteen endemic species of Iberian Peninsula, Canary and Balearic Islands after 3234 years of storage at low temperature and very low moisture content. Seed Sci Technol 36:407‒422

Pérez-García F, ME González-Benito, C Gómez-Campo (2007). High viability recorded in ultra-dry seeds of 37 species of Brassicaceae after almost 40 years of storage. Seed Sci Technol 35:143‒153

Perry DA (1978). Report of the vigour test committee 19741977. Seed Sci Technol 6:159‒181

Powell AA, S Matthews (1979). The influence of testa condition on the imbibition and vigour of pea seeds. J Exp Bot 30:193197

Rosenberg LA, RW Rinne (1986). Moisture loss as a prerequisite for seedling growth in soybean seeds (Glycine max L. Merr.). J Exp Bot 37:16631674

Roulin S, U Feller (2001). Reversible accumulation of (1-3, 1-4)-ß-glucan endohydrolase in wheat leaves under sugar depletion. J Exp Bot 52:2323‒2332

Song J, G Feng, CY Tian, FS Zhang (2005). Strategies for adaptation of Suaeda physophora, Haloxylon ammodendron and Haloxylon persicum to a saline environment during seed-germination stage. Ann Bot 96:399‒405

Stieger PA, U Feller (1994). Senescence and protein remobilisation in leaves of maturing wheat plants grown on waterlogged soil. Plant Soil 166:173‒179


Sun WQ (1997). Glassy state and seed storage stability: The WLF kinetics of seed viability loss at T-Tg and the plasticization effect of water on storage stability. Ann Bot 79:291‒297

Tetteroo FAA, C Bomal1, FA Hoekstra, CM Karssen (1994). Effect of abscisic acid and slow drying on soluble carbohydrate content in developing embryoids of carrot (Daucus carota L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Seed Sci Res 4:203210

Turnbull LA, C Paul-Victor, B Schmid, DW Purves (2008). Growth rates, seed size and physiology: Do small-seeded species really grow faster? Ecology 89:1352–1363

Vertucci CW, JM Farrant (1995). Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. In: Seed Development and Germination. Kigel S, G Galil (Eds.). Marcel Dekker, New York, USA

Vertucci CW, EE Roos, J Crane (1994). Theoretical basis of protocols for seed storage III. Optimum moisture contents for pea seeds stored at different temperatures. Ann Bot 74:531‒540

Walters C, D Ballesteros, VA Vertucci (2010). Structural mechanics of seed deterioration: Standing the test of time. Plant Sci 179:565573

Walters C, J Engels (1998). The effects of storing seeds under extremely dry conditions. Seed Sci Res 8:38

Westoby M, E Jurade, M Leishman (1992). Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. Trends Ecol Evol 7:368‒372

Woodstock LW, J Simkin, E Schroeder (1976). Freeze drying to improve seed storability. Seed Sci Technol 4:301‒311

Zheng GH (1994). Ultradry seed storage: Possible improved strategies and technology for germplasm conservation. Chin Biodivers 2:61‒65

Zheng GH, XM Jing, KL Tao (1998). Ultradry seed storage cuts cost of gene bank. Nature 393:223‒224

Zeng L, LJ Zhao, Q Sun, XW Xu (2006). Effects of ultradrying treatment and storage temperature on vigor and physiological changes of Salvia splendens Seeds. Sci Agric Sin 39:20762082

Zhu C, J Chen (2007). Changes in soluble sugar and antioxidant enzymes in peanut seeds during ultra-dry storage and after accelerated aging. Seed Sci Technol 35:387‒401